ACIO vs CGUS
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF vs Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Which is better, ACIO or CGUS?
Nearly the same fund. CGUS costs less.
CGUS has a lower expense ratio. CGUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. ACIO is less concentrated, with 40.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIO | CGUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.33%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $12.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 0.82% |
| Holdings | 524 | 75 |
| YTD Return | +9.08% | +13.10%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.87% | +16.24%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.26% | +22.60%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.31% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.4%Best | 14.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.1%Best | -21.9% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $16,068 | $19,280Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.4%Best | 42.4% |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | Capital Group (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 2019 | Feb 22, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 12, 2026 (4.6 years).
ACIO vs CGUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
ACIO vs CGUS Performance
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) is an ETF from Capital Group (US). Over the past year ACIO returned +9.87% while CGUS returned +16.24%. Year to date, ACIO is up 9.08% versus a gain of 13.10% for CGUS.
Over three years, ACIO compounded at +16.26% per year against +22.60% for CGUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 10.4% for ACIO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.1% for ACIO and -21.9% for CGUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIO charges 0.79% per year while CGUS charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $33 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIO currently yields 0.37% against 0.82% for CGUS.
Holdings Overlap
54.2% of ACIO's money is in holdings CGUS also owns. 69.8% of CGUS's money is in holdings ACIO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
40 positions in common, counted across the 165 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 68 in CGUS, against full books of 524 and 75.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for CGUS that do not appear in our book for ACIO (18.9% of the fund), and 124 for ACIO that do not appear in CGUS (45.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIO | Weight in CGUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.77% | 7.42% | 0.35% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.75% | 6.79% | 1.04% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.43% | 2.53% | 4.90% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.79% | 4.88% | 1.09% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.49% | 5.39% | 2.90% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.60% | 1.87% | 3.73% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.23% | 4.07% | 1.84% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.40% | 3.61% | 2.21% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.77% | 1.88% | 0.11% |
| BLKBlackrock Funding Inc/De | 1.10% | 1.62% | 0.52% |
69.8% of CGUS is already inside ACIO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIO or CGUS?
ACIO has an expense ratio of 0.79% while CGUS charges 0.33%. CGUS is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACIO or CGUS?
Over the past year ACIO returned +9.87% vs +16.24% for CGUS, so CGUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACIO or CGUS?
CGUS has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 10.4% for ACIO. Worst drawdown: ACIO -12.1% vs CGUS -21.9%.
Should I hold both ACIO and CGUS?
ACIO and CGUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACIO and CGUS?
69.8% of CGUS's money is in holdings ACIO also owns. 69.8% of CGUS's is in holdings ACIO also owns. They hold 40 positions in common, counted across the 165 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 68 in CGUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIO or CGUS?
ACIO yields 0.37% while CGUS yields 0.82%, so CGUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CGUS better than ACIO?
CGUS has a lower expense ratio. CGUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. ACIO is less concentrated, with 40.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.