ACVF vs IVV
American Conservative Values ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ACVF or IVV?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. ACVF is less concentrated, with 28.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVF | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $154M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.51% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 391 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +10.15% | +12.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.87% | +17.04%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.40% | +21.24%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.37% | +13.08%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8%Best | 15.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,133 | $18,490Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.7%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | ACV ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 29, 2020 to Sep 17, 2026 (5.9 years).
ACVF vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.9 years both funds cover.
ACVF vs IVV Performance
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is an ETF from ACV ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ACVF returned +11.87% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, ACVF is up 10.15% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.
Over three years, ACVF compounded at +17.40% per year against +21.24% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.37% and +13.08% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +16.84% annualized vs +15.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 14.8% for ACVF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for ACVF and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVF charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVF currently yields 0.51% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
95.3% of ACVF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 64.5% of IVV's money is in holdings ACVF also owns.
Most of ACVF is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
328 positions in common, counted across the 387 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 490 in IVV, against full books of 391 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 156 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ACVF (34.4% of the fund), and 47 for ACVF that do not appear in IVV (4.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACVF | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.32% | 8.07% | 0.25% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.36% | 5.69% | 0.33% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.55% | 2.65% | 0.10% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.74% | 0.66% | 2.08% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.60% | 1.63% | 0.03% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.67% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.62% | 1.39% | 0.23% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.15% | 1.56% | 0.41% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.62% | 1.01% | 0.61% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.27% | 1.16% | 0.11% |
95.3% of ACVF is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVF or IVV?
ACVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACVF or IVV?
Over the past year ACVF returned +11.87% vs +17.04% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ACVF annualized +15.27% vs +16.84% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACVF or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 14.8% for ACVF. Worst drawdown: ACVF -24.4% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both ACVF and IVV?
ACVF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVF and IVV?
95.3% of ACVF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 64.5% of IVV's is in holdings ACVF also owns. They hold 328 positions in common, counted across the 387 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVF or IVV?
ACVF yields 0.51% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ACVF?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. ACVF is less concentrated, with 28.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.