ACVF vs VOO
American Conservative Values ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ACVF or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. ACVF is less concentrated, with 28.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $154M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.51% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 391 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +10.15% | +12.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.87% | +17.03%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.40% | +21.25%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.37% | +13.08%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8%Best | 15.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,133 | $18,490Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.7%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | ACV ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 29, 2020 to Sep 17, 2026 (5.9 years).
ACVF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.9 years both funds cover.
ACVF vs VOO Performance
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is an ETF from ACV ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACVF returned +11.87% while VOO returned +17.03%. Year to date, ACVF is up 10.15% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, ACVF compounded at +17.40% per year against +21.25% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.37% and +13.08% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +16.84% annualized vs +15.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 14.8% for ACVF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for ACVF and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVF charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVF currently yields 0.51% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
96.0% of ACVF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 64.3% of VOO's money is in holdings ACVF also owns.
Most of ACVF is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
334 positions in common, counted across the 387 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 494 in VOO, against full books of 391 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 157 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ACVF (35.0% of the fund), and 42 for ACVF that do not appear in VOO (3.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACVF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.32% | 7.55% | 0.77% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.36% | 5.36% | 0.00% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.55% | 2.86% | 0.31% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.74% | 0.71% | 2.03% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.67% | 1.41% | 0.26% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.62% | 1.46% | 0.16% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.60% | 1.44% | 0.16% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.62% | 1.00% | 0.62% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.15% | 1.36% | 0.21% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.27% | 1.21% | 0.06% |
96.0% of ACVF is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVF or VOO?
ACVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACVF or VOO?
Over the past year ACVF returned +11.87% vs +17.03% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ACVF annualized +15.27% vs +16.84% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACVF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 14.8% for ACVF. Worst drawdown: ACVF -24.4% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both ACVF and VOO?
ACVF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVF and VOO?
96.0% of ACVF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 64.3% of VOO's is in holdings ACVF also owns. They hold 334 positions in common, counted across the 387 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVF or VOO?
ACVF yields 0.51% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than ACVF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. ACVF is less concentrated, with 28.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.