ACVF vs VOO
American Conservative Values ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $159M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 388 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.77% | +12.76% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.47% | +20.14% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.46% | +21.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.72% | +13.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ACV ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ACVF vs VOO Performance
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is a ETF from ACV ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACVF returned +15.47% while VOO returned +20.14%. Year to date, ACVF is up 12.77% versus a gain of 12.76% for VOO.
Over three years, ACVF compounded at +18.46% per year against +21.69% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.72% and +13.00% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ACVF has the edge at +15.91% annualized vs +13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for ACVF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVF charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVF currently yields 0.52% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ACVF and VOO share 339 holdings out of 555 unique holdings combined, representing a 60.4% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVF or VOO?
ACVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACVF or VOO?
Over the past year ACVF returned +15.47% vs +20.14% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ACVF annualized +15.91% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACVF or VOO?
ACVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ACVF -24.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ACVF and VOO?
ACVF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVF and VOO?
ACVF and VOO share 339 common holdings with a 60.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 555 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVF or VOO?
ACVF yields 0.52% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.