ACVF vs QQQ
American Conservative Values ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. ACVF offers more diversification with 388 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVF | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $159M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 388 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +12.77% | +16.30% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.47% | +24.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.46% | +25.48% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.72% | +14.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | ACV ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ACVF vs QQQ Performance
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is a ETF from ACV ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ACVF returned +15.47% while QQQ returned +24.83%. Year to date, ACVF is up 12.77% versus a gain of 16.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, ACVF compounded at +18.46% per year against +25.48% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +11.72% and +14.50% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ACVF has the edge at +15.91% annualized vs +13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.9% for ACVF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for ACVF and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVF charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVF currently yields 0.52% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
ACVF and QQQ share 66 holdings out of 425 unique holdings combined, representing a 39.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVF or QQQ?
ACVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACVF or QQQ?
Over the past year ACVF returned +15.47% vs +24.83% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ACVF annualized +15.91% vs +13.01% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACVF or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.9% for ACVF. Worst drawdown: ACVF -24.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ACVF and QQQ?
ACVF and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVF and QQQ?
ACVF and QQQ share 66 common holdings with a 39.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 425 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVF or QQQ?
ACVF yields 0.52% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so ACVF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.