ACVF vs VYM
American Conservative Values ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, ACVF or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 28.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVF | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $154M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.51% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 391 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +10.15% | +12.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.87% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.40% | +17.42%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.37% | +12.12%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 13.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,133 | $17,718Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.7% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | ACV ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 29, 2020 to Sep 17, 2026 (5.9 years).
ACVF vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.9 years both funds cover.
ACVF vs VYM Performance
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is an ETF from ACV ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACVF returned +11.87% while VYM returned +16.61%. Year to date, ACVF is up 10.15% versus a gain of 12.29% for VYM.
Over three years, ACVF compounded at +17.40% per year against +17.42% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.37% and +12.12% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +15.79% annualized vs +15.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 13.9% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for ACVF and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVF charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVF currently yields 0.51% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
40.3% of ACVF's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 66.8% of VYM's money is in holdings ACVF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
192 positions in common, counted across the 387 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 557 in VYM, against full books of 391 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 339 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for ACVF (30.8% of the fund), and 184 for ACVF that do not appear in VYM (59.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACVF | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.55% | 7.35% | 4.80% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.74% | 1.86% | 0.88% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.62% | 2.63% | 1.01% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.99% | 1.80% | 0.81% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 1.13% | 1.34% | 0.21% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.87% | 1.50% | 0.63% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.83% | 1.31% | 0.48% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.61% | 1.48% | 0.87% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.59% | 1.37% | 0.78% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.73% | 1.21% | 0.48% |
66.8% of VYM is already inside ACVF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVF or VYM?
ACVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACVF or VYM?
Over the past year ACVF returned +11.87% vs +16.61% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ACVF annualized +15.27% vs +15.79% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACVF or VYM?
ACVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 13.9% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ACVF -24.4% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both ACVF and VYM?
ACVF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVF and VYM?
66.8% of VYM's money is in holdings ACVF also owns. 66.8% of VYM's is in holdings ACVF also owns. They hold 192 positions in common, counted across the 387 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVF or VYM?
ACVF yields 0.51% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than ACVF?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 28.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.