ACVF vs VTI
American Conservative Values ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ACVF or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. ACVF is less concentrated, with 28.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $154M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.51% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 391 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +10.15% | +12.28%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.87% | +16.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.40% | +20.89%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.37% | +11.94%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8%Best | 15.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,133 | $17,576Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.7%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | ACV ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 29, 2020 to Sep 17, 2026 (5.9 years).
ACVF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.9 years both funds cover.
ACVF vs VTI Performance
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is an ETF from ACV ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACVF returned +11.87% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, ACVF is up 10.15% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Over three years, ACVF compounded at +17.40% per year against +20.89% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.37% and +11.94% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +16.05% annualized vs +15.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 14.8% for ACVF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for ACVF and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVF charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVF currently yields 0.51% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.7% of ACVF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 57.5% of VTI's money is in holdings ACVF also owns.
Most of ACVF is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
380 positions in common, counted across the 387 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 391 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 794 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ACVF (40.1% of the fund), and 4 for ACVF that do not appear in VTI (0.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACVF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.32% | 6.40% | 1.92% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.36% | 4.79% | 0.57% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.55% | 2.56% | 0.01% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.74% | 0.57% | 2.17% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.67% | 1.35% | 0.32% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.62% | 1.28% | 0.34% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.60% | 1.29% | 0.31% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.62% | 0.89% | 0.73% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.15% | 1.22% | 0.07% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.27% | 1.08% | 0.19% |
98.7% of ACVF is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVF or VTI?
ACVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACVF or VTI?
Over the past year ACVF returned +11.87% vs +16.78% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ACVF annualized +15.27% vs +16.05% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACVF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 14.8% for ACVF. Worst drawdown: ACVF -24.4% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both ACVF and VTI?
ACVF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVF and VTI?
98.7% of ACVF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 57.5% of VTI's is in holdings ACVF also owns. They hold 380 positions in common, counted across the 387 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVF or VTI?
ACVF yields 0.51% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ACVF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. ACVF is less concentrated, with 28.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.