AOD vs FFLV
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
Quick Verdict
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. FFLV offers more diversification with 105 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | FFLV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.38% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $16M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 1.41% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 119 | |
| YTD Return | +18.03% | +17.97% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.72% | +32.15% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.88% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.28% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 12.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -16.7% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Fidelity Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Feb 9, 2024 |
AOD vs FFLV Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% while FFLV returned +32.15%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.03% versus a gain of 17.97% for FFLV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 12.3% for FFLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -16.7% for FFLV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while FFLV charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $38 annually, a gap of $78 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 1.41% for FFLV.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and FFLV share 15 holdings out of 175 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or FFLV?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while FFLV charges 0.38%. FFLV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $78 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or FFLV?
Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% vs +32.15% for FFLV, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AOD annualized -4.05% vs +17.62% for FFLV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or FFLV?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 12.3% for FFLV. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs FFLV -16.7%.
Should I hold both AOD and FFLV?
AOD and FFLV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and FFLV?
AOD and FFLV share 15 common holdings with a 17.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 175 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or FFLV?
AOD yields 11.72% while FFLV yields 1.41%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.