ARVR vs IVV
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ARVR or IVV?
ARVR has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ARVR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ARVR is less concentrated, with 35.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARVR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 89 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +15.85%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +18.65%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.70%Best | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.3% | -19.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $20,021Best | $18,277 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.3%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 20, 2022 to Sep 11, 2026 (4.4 years).
ARVR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
ARVR vs IVV Performance
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ARVR returned +18.65% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, ARVR is up 15.85% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Over three years, ARVR compounded at +24.70% per year against +21.27% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, ARVR has the edge at +17.09% annualized vs +14.69%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 15.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.3% for ARVR and -19.2% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARVR charges 0.70% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARVR currently yields 0.65% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
46.3% of ARVR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 27.4% of IVV's money is in holdings ARVR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in ARVR and 505 in IVV, against full books of 89 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 480 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ARVR (71.9% of the fund), and 6 for ARVR that do not appear in IVV (13.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ARVR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 3.43% | 7.98% | 4.55% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.11% | 6.86% | 3.75% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.02% | 5.44% | 1.42% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 2.95% | 1.94% | 1.01% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.85% | 1.51% | 1.34% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 2.80% | 1.18% | 1.62% |
| ADBEAdobe Inc | 3.69% | 0.16% | 3.53% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 3.36% | 0.32% | 3.04% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 3.11% | 0.47% | 2.64% |
| INTCIntel Corp. | 2.85% | 0.72% | 2.13% |
46.3% of ARVR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARVR or IVV?
ARVR has an expense ratio of 0.70% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARVR or IVV?
Over the past year ARVR returned +18.65% vs +17.57% for IVV, so ARVR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ARVR annualized +17.09% vs +14.69% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARVR or IVV?
ARVR has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 15.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ARVR -26.3% vs IVV -19.2%.
Should I hold both ARVR and IVV?
ARVR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ARVR and IVV?
46.3% of ARVR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 27.4% of IVV's is in holdings ARVR also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in ARVR and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARVR or IVV?
ARVR yields 0.65% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ARVR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ARVR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ARVR is less concentrated, with 35.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.