ARVR vs VOO
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ARVR or VOO?
ARVR has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ARVR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ARVR is less concentrated, with 35.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARVR | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 89 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +15.85%Best | +13.81% |
| 1Y Return | +21.78%Best | +21.53% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.08%Best | +21.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.87% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.3% | -19.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $20,089Best | $18,545 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.3%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 20, 2022 to Sep 3, 2026 (4.4 years).
ARVR vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
ARVR vs VOO Performance
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ARVR returned +21.78% while VOO returned +21.53%. Year to date, ARVR is up 15.85% versus a gain of 13.81% for VOO.
Over three years, ARVR compounded at +24.08% per year against +21.46% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, ARVR has the edge at +17.18% annualized vs +15.07%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 15.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.3% for ARVR and -19.1% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARVR charges 0.70% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARVR currently yields 0.69% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
46.3% of ARVR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 26.8% of VOO's money is in holdings ARVR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in ARVR and 505 in VOO, against full books of 89 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ARVR (72.7% of the fund), and 6 for ARVR that do not appear in VOO (13.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ARVR | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 3.43% | 7.51% | 4.08% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.11% | 6.59% | 3.48% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.02% | 4.30% | 0.28% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.95% | 1.92% | 1.03% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.85% | 2.02% | 0.83% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.80% | 1.47% | 1.33% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 2.85% | 1.02% | 1.83% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 3.69% | 0.13% | 3.56% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 3.36% | 0.34% | 3.02% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 3.11% | 0.47% | 2.64% |
46.3% of ARVR is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARVR or VOO?
ARVR has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARVR or VOO?
Over the past year ARVR returned +21.78% vs +21.53% for VOO, so ARVR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ARVR annualized +17.18% vs +15.07% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARVR or VOO?
ARVR has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 15.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ARVR -26.3% vs VOO -19.1%.
Should I hold both ARVR and VOO?
ARVR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ARVR and VOO?
46.3% of ARVR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 26.8% of VOO's is in holdings ARVR also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in ARVR and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARVR or VOO?
ARVR yields 0.69% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than ARVR?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ARVR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ARVR is less concentrated, with 35.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.