ARVR vs VTI
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ARVR or VTI?
ARVR has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ARVR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARVR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 89 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +17.63%Best | +13.10% |
| 1Y Return | +17.48%Best | +17.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.29%Best | +22.26% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.3% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $20,210Best | $17,867 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 20, 2022 to Sep 24, 2026 (4.4 years).
ARVR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
ARVR vs VTI Performance
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ARVR returned +17.48% while VTI returned +17.01%. Year to date, ARVR is up 17.63% versus a gain of 13.10% for VTI.
Over three years, ARVR compounded at +27.29% per year against +22.26% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, ARVR has the edge at +17.34% annualized vs +14.10%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.3% for ARVR and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARVR charges 0.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARVR currently yields 0.65% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
58.3% of ARVR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 23.8% of VTI's money is in holdings ARVR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
21 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in ARVR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 89 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,131 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ARVR (73.7% of the fund), and 1 for ARVR that do not appear in VTI (1.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ARVR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.33% | 6.40% | 3.07% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.07% | 6.29% | 3.22% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.04% | 4.79% | 0.75% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.77% | 1.70% | 1.07% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.96% | 1.29% | 1.67% |
| UUnity Software Inc. | 4.19% | 0.02% | 4.17% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 4.02% | 0.14% | 3.88% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.64% | 1.08% | 1.56% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 3.29% | 0.42% | 2.87% |
| ZMZoom Communications Inc | 3.29% | 0.03% | 3.26% |
58.3% of ARVR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARVR or VTI?
ARVR has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARVR or VTI?
Over the past year ARVR returned +17.48% vs +17.01% for VTI, so ARVR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ARVR annualized +17.34% vs +14.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARVR or VTI?
ARVR has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ARVR -26.3% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both ARVR and VTI?
ARVR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ARVR and VTI?
58.3% of ARVR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 23.8% of VTI's is in holdings ARVR also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in ARVR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARVR or VTI?
ARVR yields 0.65% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ARVR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ARVR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.