AVUC vs OMFL

AVUC vs OMFL

Which is better, AVUC or OMFL?

AVUC costs less.

AVUC has a lower expense ratio. AVUC is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.5%.

Lower Fees: AVUCLess Concentrated: AVUC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAVUCOMFL
Expense Ratio0.17%Best0.29%
AUM-$4.7B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.82%
Holdings1,568637
YTD Return-0.65%+15.52%Best
1Y Return-+19.49%
3Y Return (annualized)-+15.50%
5Y Return (annualized)-+8.15%
Top 10 Weight36.4%Best36.5%
Fund FamilyAvantis InvestorsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 13, 2026Nov 8, 2017

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AVUC vs OMFL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AVUC against instead:AVUC vs SPYAVUC vs QQQAVUC vs VOOAVUC vs VTIOMFL against:OMFL vs VXUS

AVUC vs OMFL Performance

Avantis US Core Equity ETF (AVUC) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, AVUC is down 0.65% versus a gain of 15.52% for OMFL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AVUC charges 0.17% per year while OMFL charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $17 vs $29 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVUC currently yields 0.00% against 0.82% for OMFL.

Holdings Overlap

AVUC already in OMFL72.4%
OMFL already in AVUC99.4%

72.4% of AVUC's money is in holdings OMFL also owns. 99.4% of OMFL's money is in holdings AVUC also owns.

Most of OMFL is already inside AVUC. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

605 positions in common, counted across the 1,568 positions we hold weights for in AVUC and 633 in OMFL, against full books of 1,568 and 637.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 20 positions for OMFL that do not appear in our book for AVUC (0.6% of the fund), and 181 for AVUC that do not appear in OMFL (24.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AVUCWeight in OMFLDifference
AAPLApple, Inc5.32%9.27%3.95%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 373.97%6.63%2.66%
NVDANvidia Corp.3.91%4.83%0.92%
VVisa Inc1.10%3.26%2.16%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.16%1.96%0.20%
MAMastercard Inc1.44%2.49%1.05%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.24%2.35%1.11%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.69%1.79%0.10%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc1.05%2.42%1.37%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common1.75%1.51%0.24%

99.4% of OMFL is already inside AVUC.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AVUCOMFL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AVUC or OMFL?

AVUC has an expense ratio of 0.17% while OMFL charges 0.29%. AVUC is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AVUC and OMFL?

99.4% of OMFL's money is in holdings AVUC also owns. 99.4% of OMFL's is in holdings AVUC also owns. They hold 605 positions in common, counted across the 1,568 positions we hold weights for in AVUC and 633 in OMFL.

Which pays a higher dividend, AVUC or OMFL?

AVUC yields 0.00% while OMFL yields 0.82%, so OMFL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is OMFL better than AVUC?

AVUC has a lower expense ratio. AVUC is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.