BAGX vs OMFL
EA Bridgeway Aggressive Investors ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Which is better, BAGX or OMFL?
OMFL has been ahead.
OMFL has a lower expense ratio. OMFL led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 27.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAGX | OMFL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.73% | 0.29%Best |
| AUM | $188M | $4.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.82% |
| Holdings | 97 | 637 |
| YTD Return | -0.49% | +15.52%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.49% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.50% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.15% |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.5%Best | 36.5% |
| Fund Family | Bridgeway Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2026 | Nov 8, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BAGX vs OMFL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BAGX vs OMFL Performance
EA Bridgeway Aggressive Investors ETF (BAGX) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BAGX is down 0.49% versus a gain of 15.52% for OMFL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAGX charges 0.73% per year while OMFL charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $29 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAGX currently yields 0.00% against 0.82% for OMFL.
Holdings Overlap
86.3% of BAGX's money is in holdings OMFL also owns. 45.3% of OMFL's money is in holdings BAGX also owns.
Most of BAGX is already inside OMFL. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
78 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 633 in OMFL, against full books of 97 and 637.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 528 positions for OMFL that do not appear in our book for BAGX (52.6% of the fund), and 14 for BAGX that do not appear in OMFL (10.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAGX | Weight in OMFL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.91% | 9.27% | 4.36% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 3.84% | 6.63% | 2.79% |
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 5.10% | 4.83% | 0.27% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.51% | 2.42% | 1.09% |
| VVisa Inc | 1.17% | 3.26% | 2.09% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 1.20% | 2.49% | 1.29% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.19% | 2.35% | 1.16% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.67% | 1.79% | 0.12% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.91% | 0.89% | 1.02% |
| LRCXLam Research Corporation | 1.44% | 1.08% | 0.36% |
86.3% of BAGX is already inside OMFL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAGX or OMFL?
BAGX has an expense ratio of 0.73% while OMFL charges 0.29%. OMFL is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BAGX and OMFL?
86.3% of BAGX's money is in holdings OMFL also owns. 45.3% of OMFL's is in holdings BAGX also owns. They hold 78 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 633 in OMFL.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAGX or OMFL?
BAGX yields 0.00% while OMFL yields 0.82%, so OMFL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OMFL better than BAGX?
OMFL has a lower expense ratio. OMFL led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 27.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.