BLCR vs ENHU
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF vs iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF
Which is better, BLCR or ENHU?
Nearly the same fund. ENHU costs less.
ENHU has a lower expense ratio. BLCR led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. ENHU is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLCR | ENHU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.22%Best |
| AUM | $9.4B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 0.74% |
| Holdings | 108 | 708 |
| YTD Return | +14.81%Best | +12.74% |
| 1Y Return | +16.63%Best | +13.49% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.44% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 13.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.3% | -9.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,768Best | $11,413 |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.6% | 38.2%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2023 | Nov 4, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 5, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1 years).
BLCR vs ENHU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
BLCR vs ENHU Performance
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF (BLCR) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BLCR returned +16.63% while ENHU returned +13.49%. Year to date, BLCR is up 14.81% versus a gain of 12.74% for ENHU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 13.1% for ENHU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.3% for BLCR and -9.0% for ENHU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLCR charges 0.36% per year while ENHU charges 0.22%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $22 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLCR currently yields 0.32% against 0.74% for ENHU.
Holdings Overlap
81.6% of BLCR's money is in holdings ENHU also owns. 47.3% of ENHU's money is in holdings BLCR also owns.
Most of BLCR is already inside ENHU. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
39 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in BLCR and 351 in ENHU, against full books of 108 and 708.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 293 positions for ENHU that do not appear in our book for BLCR (51.9% of the fund), and 12 for BLCR that do not appear in ENHU (16.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BLCR | Weight in ENHU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.36% | 7.43% | 0.07% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.47% | 6.14% | 0.33% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 4.55% | 7.26% | 2.71% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.72% | 3.90% | 1.82% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.00% | 3.07% | 1.93% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.18% | 2.46% | 2.72% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.20% | 1.36% | 2.84% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.50% | 1.58% | 1.92% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.58% | 1.29% | 1.29% |
| CAHCardinal Health | 3.50% | 0.22% | 3.28% |
81.6% of BLCR is already inside ENHU.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLCR or ENHU?
BLCR has an expense ratio of 0.36% while ENHU charges 0.22%. ENHU is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BLCR or ENHU?
Over the past year BLCR returned +16.63% vs +13.49% for ENHU, so BLCR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BLCR annualized +17.68% vs +14.13% for ENHU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BLCR or ENHU?
BLCR has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 13.1% for ENHU. Worst drawdown: BLCR -10.3% vs ENHU -9.0%.
Should I hold both BLCR and ENHU?
BLCR and ENHU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BLCR and ENHU?
81.6% of BLCR's money is in holdings ENHU also owns. 47.3% of ENHU's is in holdings BLCR also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in BLCR and 351 in ENHU.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLCR or ENHU?
BLCR yields 0.32% while ENHU yields 0.74%, so ENHU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ENHU better than BLCR?
ENHU has a lower expense ratio. BLCR led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. ENHU is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.