BRNY vs IVV
Burney US Factor Rotation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BRNY delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BRNY | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $619M | $886.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.21% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 74 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +14.84% | +12.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.65% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.26% | +21.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.62% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Burney Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
BRNY vs IVV Performance
Burney US Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) is a ETF from Burney Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BRNY returned +26.65% while IVV returned +20.92%. Year to date, BRNY is up 14.84% versus a gain of 12.64% for IVV.
Over three years, BRNY compounded at +26.26% per year against +21.07% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, BRNY has the edge at +25.53% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.5% for BRNY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for BRNY and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BRNY charges 0.79% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BRNY currently yields 0.21% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BRNY and IVV share 30 holdings out of 546 unique holdings combined, representing a 28.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BRNY or IVV?
BRNY has an expense ratio of 0.79% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BRNY or IVV?
Over the past year BRNY returned +26.65% vs +20.92% for IVV, so BRNY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BRNY annualized +25.53% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BRNY or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.5% for BRNY. Worst drawdown: BRNY -19.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BRNY and IVV?
BRNY and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BRNY and IVV?
BRNY and IVV share 30 common holdings with a 28.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 546 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BRNY or IVV?
BRNY yields 0.21% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.