DCOR vs FDWM
Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF vs Fidelity Womens Leadership ETF
Which is better, DCOR or FDWM?
Nearly the same fund. DCOR costs less.
DCOR has a lower expense ratio. DCOR led over the full window, FDWM over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DCOR | FDWM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $45.6B | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 0.52% |
| Holdings | 2,404 | 82 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 14.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1%Best | -21.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $14,902Best | $14,533 |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2005 | Jun 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 336 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DCOR has data through Oct 15, 2026 and FDWM through Nov 13, 2025.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 13, 2023 to Nov 13, 2025 (2.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDWM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.0% compared with 12.8% for DCOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for DCOR and -21.3% for FDWM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DCOR charges 0.14% per year while FDWM charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $59 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DCOR currently yields 0.91% against 0.52% for FDWM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 543 holdings in DCOR and 86 in FDWM, totalling 80.8% and 99.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 432 days apart, DCOR as of Oct 6, 2026 and FDWM as of Jul 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 543 positions we hold weights for in DCOR and 86 in FDWM, against full books of 2,404 and 82.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DCOR and FDWM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DCOR or FDWM?
DCOR has an expense ratio of 0.14% while FDWM charges 0.59%. DCOR is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, DCOR or FDWM?
FDWM has been the more volatile fund at 14.0% annualized versus 12.8% for DCOR. Worst drawdown: DCOR -19.1% vs FDWM -21.3%.
Should I hold both DCOR and FDWM?
DCOR and FDWM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DCOR or FDWM?
DCOR yields 0.91% while FDWM yields 0.52%, so DCOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FDWM better than DCOR?
DCOR has a lower expense ratio. DCOR led over the full window, FDWM over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.