ECML vs FIFT
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs HCM Select 50 ETF
Which is better, ECML or FIFT?
ECML costs less.
ECML has a lower expense ratio. FIFT is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 22.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECML | FIFT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95%Best | 1.35% |
| AUM | $123M | $67M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.14% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 197 | 50 |
| YTD Price Return | +17.97% | - |
| 1Y Price Return | +22.20% | - |
| 3Y Price Return (annualized) | +12.34% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | - |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.2% | 21.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Euclidean Technologies | Howard Capital Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 18, 2023 | Oct 21, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Price Return (annualized), $10,000 over the window.
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for FIFT. We have no price series for FIFT, so there is nothing to compare it against. ECML yields 1.14% and FIFT 0.00% on top.
ECML vs FIFT Performance
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is an ETF from Euclidean Technologies and HCM Select 50 ETF (FIFT) is an ETF from Howard Capital Management.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECML charges 0.95% per year while FIFT charges 1.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $135 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECML currently yields 1.14% against 0.00% for FIFT.
Holdings Overlap
10.6% of ECML's money is in holdings FIFT also owns. 11.8% of FIFT's money is in holdings ECML also owns.
FIFT and ECML share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 50 in FIFT, against full books of 197 and 50.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 64 and 50 positions we hold weights for.
ECML holds 56 positions FIFT does not, 86.7% of the fund.
Largest: EPAM 2.78%, CROX 2.68%, HRB 2.26%, FOXA 2.10%, MPC 2.04%
Top Shared Holdings
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ECML and FIFT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECML or FIFT?
ECML has an expense ratio of 0.95% while FIFT charges 1.35%. ECML is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ECML and FIFT?
11.8% of FIFT's money is in holdings ECML also owns. 11.8% of FIFT's is in holdings ECML also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 50 in FIFT.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECML or FIFT?
ECML yields 1.14% while FIFT yields 0.00%, so ECML currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FIFT better than ECML?
ECML has a lower expense ratio. FIFT is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 22.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.