ESLG vs VOO
Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ESLG or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. ESLG is less concentrated, with 31.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ESLG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $25M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.39% | 1.05% |
| Holdings | 238 | 519 |
| YTD Return | +12.62%Best | +12.11% |
| 1Y Return | +10.29% | +12.50%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.93% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.4% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $11,205 | $11,514Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.4%Best | 39.1% |
| Fund Family | Eventide | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.1 years).
ESLG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
ESLG vs VOO Performance
Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF (ESLG) is an ETF from Eventide and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ESLG returned +10.29% while VOO returned +12.50%. Year to date, ESLG is up 12.62% versus a gain of 12.11% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ESLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 12.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for ESLG and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ESLG charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ESLG currently yields 0.39% against 1.05% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
91.1% of ESLG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 29.1% of VOO's money is in holdings ESLG also owns.
Most of ESLG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
94 positions in common, counted across the 117 positions we hold weights for in ESLG and 506 in VOO, against full books of 238 and 519.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 407 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ESLG (70.9% of the fund), and 16 for ESLG that do not appear in VOO (5.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ESLG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.00% | 8.39% | 1.61% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.55% | 2.54% | 1.01% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 3.54% | 1.41% | 2.13% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.42% | 1.52% | 0.90% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.97% | 1.83% | 0.14% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc. | 2.03% | 0.49% | 1.54% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 2.10% | 0.41% | 1.69% |
| SPGIS&p Global Inc. | 2.14% | 0.18% | 1.96% |
| HDHome Depot Inc | 1.81% | 0.43% | 1.38% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.88% | 0.16% | 1.72% |
91.1% of ESLG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ESLG or VOO?
ESLG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ESLG or VOO?
Over the past year ESLG returned +10.29% vs +12.50% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ESLG annualized +10.90% vs +13.67% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ESLG or VOO?
ESLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 12.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ESLG -12.4% vs VOO -8.9%.
Should I hold both ESLG and VOO?
ESLG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ESLG and VOO?
91.1% of ESLG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 29.1% of VOO's is in holdings ESLG also owns. They hold 94 positions in common, counted across the 117 positions we hold weights for in ESLG and 506 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, ESLG or VOO?
ESLG yields 0.39% while VOO yields 1.05%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than ESLG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. ESLG is less concentrated, with 31.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.