ETG vs IVV
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ETG or IVV?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ETG led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.3B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.85% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 193 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +5.14% | +11.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.01%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.79%Best | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.84% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -78.3% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,274 | $18,262Best |
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2004 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 3, 2004 to Sep 10, 2026 (22.6 years).
ETG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 22.6 years both funds cover.
ETG vs IVV Performance
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund (ETG) is an ETF from Eaton Vance and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ETG returned +18.01% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, ETG is up 5.14% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Over three years, ETG compounded at +20.79% per year against +20.71% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.84% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.14% annualized vs +2.53%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 14.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.3% for ETG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETG charges 1.27% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $3 annually, a gap of $124 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETG currently yields 5.85% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 41.3% of IVV's money is in holdings ETG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ETG, our book for it covers 94.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 159 days apart, ETG as of Feb 27, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
51 positions in common, counted across the 154 positions we hold weights for in ETG and 505 in IVV, against full books of 193 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ETG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 2.82% | 7.98% | 5.16% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.03% | 6.86% | 4.83% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 2.48% | 5.44% | 2.96% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 4.75% | 2.56% | 2.19% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.15% | 4.01% | 1.86% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.81% | 1.51% | 2.30% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.30% | 2.98% | 1.68% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.23% | 1.39% | 0.16% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.21% | 0.94% | 0.27% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 0.32% | 1.45% | 1.13% |
41.3% of IVV is already inside ETG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETG or IVV?
ETG has an expense ratio of 1.27% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $124 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ETG or IVV?
Over the past year ETG returned +18.01% vs +17.57% for IVV, so ETG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), ETG annualized +2.53% vs +9.14% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ETG or IVV?
ETG has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 14.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ETG -78.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ETG and IVV?
ETG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ETG and IVV?
At least 41.3% of IVV's money is in holdings ETG also owns. Our book for ETG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 51 positions in common, counted across the 154 positions we hold weights for in ETG and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETG or IVV?
ETG yields 5.85% while IVV yields 1.06%, so ETG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ETG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ETG led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.