ETG vs VTI
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ETG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.3B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 193 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.77% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.66% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.81% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.17% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2004 | May 24, 2001 |
ETG vs VTI Performance
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund (ETG) is a ETF from Eaton Vance and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ETG returned +25.66% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, ETG is up 8.77% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, ETG compounded at +22.81% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.17% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +2.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.3% for ETG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETG charges 1.27% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $3 annually, a gap of $124 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETG currently yields 6.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ETG and VTI share 54 holdings out of 2887 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETG or VTI?
ETG has an expense ratio of 1.27% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $124 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ETG or VTI?
Over the past year ETG returned +25.66% vs +22.35% for VTI, so ETG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), ETG annualized +2.69% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ETG or VTI?
ETG has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ETG -78.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ETG and VTI?
ETG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ETG and VTI?
ETG and VTI share 54 common holdings with a 22.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2887 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETG or VTI?
ETG yields 6.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ETG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.