ETG vs VTI
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ETG or VTI?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ETG led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. ETG is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.3B | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.99% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 174 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | +4.36% | +10.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.57% | +11.60%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.55%Best | +20.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.07% | +10.57%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -78.3% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,741 | $16,527Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.8%Best | 34.6% |
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2004 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 3, 2004 to Nov 10, 2026 (22.8 years).
ETG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 22.8 years both funds cover.
ETG vs VTI Performance
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund (ETG) is an ETF from Eaton Vance and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ETG returned +10.57% while VTI returned +11.60%. Year to date, ETG is up 4.36% versus a gain of 10.82% for VTI.
Over three years, ETG compounded at +22.55% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.07% and +10.57% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.13% annualized vs +2.48%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 15.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.3% for ETG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETG charges 1.27% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $3 annually, a gap of $124 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETG currently yields 5.99% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
55.5% of ETG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 37.2% of VTI's money is in holdings ETG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
49 positions in common, counted across the 147 positions we hold weights for in ETG and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 174 and 3,542.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,081 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ETG (59.7% of the fund), and 59 for ETG that do not appear in VTI (7.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ETG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.02% | 7.13% | 3.11% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.59% | 5.19% | 0.60% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 2.67% | 6.63% | 3.96% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 4.86% | 2.18% | 2.68% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.43% | 3.30% | 0.13% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.64% | 1.64% | 2.00% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.39% | 2.28% | 0.89% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 1.34% | 1.34% | 0.00% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 1.29% | 0.92% | 0.37% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.78% | 1.36% | 0.58% |
55.5% of ETG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETG or VTI?
ETG has an expense ratio of 1.27% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $124 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ETG or VTI?
Over the past year ETG returned +10.57% vs +11.60% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), ETG annualized +2.48% vs +9.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ETG or VTI?
ETG has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ETG -78.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ETG and VTI?
ETG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ETG and VTI?
55.5% of ETG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 37.2% of VTI's is in holdings ETG also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 147 positions we hold weights for in ETG and 3,464 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETG or VTI?
ETG yields 5.99% while VTI yields 1.06%, so ETG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ETG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ETG led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. ETG is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.