ETHO vs SCHD
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership US ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, ETHO or SCHD?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. ETHO led over the full window, SCHD over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. ETHO is less concentrated, with 7.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETHO | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $196M | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 288 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +22.70% | +27.56%Best |
| 1Y Return | +29.35% | +30.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.29% | +16.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.40% | +10.23%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,637 | $16,274Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 7.2%Best | 41.5% |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 18, 2015 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 19, 2015 to Sep 4, 2026 (10.8 years).
ETHO vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.8 years both funds cover.
ETHO vs SCHD Performance
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership US ETF (ETHO) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year ETHO returned +29.35% while SCHD returned +30.29%. Year to date, ETHO is up 22.70% versus a gain of 27.56% for SCHD.
Over three years, ETHO compounded at +16.29% per year against +16.37% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +6.40% and +10.23% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, ETHO has the edge at +12.46% annualized vs +11.51%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETHO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 14.8% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for ETHO and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETHO charges 0.45% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $6 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETHO currently yields 0.70% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
5.5% of ETHO's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 11.6% of SCHD's money is in holdings ETHO also owns.
SCHD and ETHO share little of their money.
16 positions in common, counted across the 284 positions we hold weights for in ETHO and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 288 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 83 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for ETHO (88.3% of the fund), and 264 for ETHO that do not appear in SCHD (92.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ETHO | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.41% | 3.53% | 3.12% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 0.39% | 2.72% | 2.33% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.37% | 2.55% | 2.18% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 0.37% | 0.97% | 0.60% |
| CINFCincinnati Financial Corp. | 0.32% | 0.69% | 0.37% |
| FNFFidelity Nationa | 0.31% | 0.32% | 0.01% |
| MSMMsc Industrial Direct Co Inc | 0.38% | 0.14% | 0.24% |
| PAGPenske Automotive Group Inc | 0.41% | 0.10% | 0.31% |
| KFYKorn Ferry | 0.39% | 0.11% | 0.28% |
| IPARInter Parfums Inc | 0.39% | 0.06% | 0.33% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ETHO and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETHO or SCHD?
ETHO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ETHO or SCHD?
Over the past year ETHO returned +29.35% vs +30.29% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), ETHO annualized +12.46% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ETHO or SCHD?
ETHO has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 14.8% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: ETHO -36.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both ETHO and SCHD?
ETHO and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ETHO and SCHD?
11.6% of SCHD's money is in holdings ETHO also owns. 11.6% of SCHD's is in holdings ETHO also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 284 positions we hold weights for in ETHO and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETHO or SCHD?
ETHO yields 0.70% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than ETHO?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. ETHO led over the full window, SCHD over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. ETHO is less concentrated, with 7.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.