ETHO vs VOO
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership US ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ETHO or VOO?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ETHO led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. ETHO is less concentrated, with 7.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETHO | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $196M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 288 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +22.70%Best | +13.37% |
| 1Y Return | +29.35%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.29% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.40% | +12.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,637 | $18,335Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 7.2%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 18, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 19, 2015 to Sep 4, 2026 (10.8 years).
ETHO vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.8 years both funds cover.
ETHO vs VOO Performance
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership US ETF (ETHO) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ETHO returned +29.35% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, ETHO is up 22.70% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, ETHO compounded at +16.29% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.40% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.71% annualized vs +12.46%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETHO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for ETHO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETHO charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETHO currently yields 0.70% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
24.4% of ETHO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 30.4% of VOO's money is in holdings ETHO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
73 positions in common, counted across the 284 positions we hold weights for in ETHO and 505 in VOO, against full books of 288 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 424 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ETHO (69.1% of the fund), and 207 for ETHO that do not appear in VOO (73.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ETHO | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 0.36% | 7.51% | 7.15% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.36% | 6.59% | 6.23% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 0.38% | 4.30% | 3.92% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 0.34% | 3.25% | 2.91% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.34% | 0.87% | 0.53% |
| KLACKla Corp | 0.38% | 0.61% | 0.23% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.31% | 0.64% | 0.33% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.41% | 0.42% | 0.01% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 0.44% | 0.27% | 0.17% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 0.56% | 0.13% | 0.43% |
30.4% of VOO is already inside ETHO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETHO or VOO?
ETHO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ETHO or VOO?
Over the past year ETHO returned +29.35% vs +20.08% for VOO, so ETHO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), ETHO annualized +12.46% vs +13.71% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ETHO or VOO?
ETHO has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ETHO -36.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ETHO and VOO?
ETHO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ETHO and VOO?
30.4% of VOO's money is in holdings ETHO also owns. 30.4% of VOO's is in holdings ETHO also owns. They hold 73 positions in common, counted across the 284 positions we hold weights for in ETHO and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETHO or VOO?
ETHO yields 0.70% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than ETHO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ETHO led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. ETHO is less concentrated, with 7.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.