ETHO vs IVV
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership US ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ETHO or IVV?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ETHO led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. ETHO is less concentrated, with 7.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETHO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $196M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 288 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +21.71%Best | +12.70% |
| 1Y Return | +27.84%Best | +19.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.60% | +21.16%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.31% | +12.75%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,579 | $18,221Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 7.2%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 18, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 19, 2015 to Sep 8, 2026 (10.8 years).
ETHO vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.8 years both funds cover.
ETHO vs IVV Performance
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership US ETF (ETHO) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ETHO returned +27.84% while IVV returned +19.36%. Year to date, ETHO is up 21.71% versus a gain of 12.70% for IVV.
Over three years, ETHO compounded at +16.60% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.31% and +12.75% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +12.36%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETHO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for ETHO and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETHO charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETHO currently yields 0.70% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
24.4% of ETHO's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 32.1% of IVV's money is in holdings ETHO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
73 positions in common, counted across the 284 positions we hold weights for in ETHO and 504 in IVV, against full books of 288 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 420 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ETHO (67.1% of the fund), and 208 for ETHO that do not appear in IVV (73.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ETHO | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 0.36% | 7.98% | 7.62% |
| AAPLApple Inc Ord | 0.36% | 6.86% | 6.50% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 0.38% | 5.44% | 5.06% |
| GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A | 0.34% | 3.19% | 2.85% |
| V'visa Inc., Class 'a'' | 0.34% | 0.92% | 0.58% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.31% | 0.69% | 0.38% |
| TXNTexas Instruments, Inc | 0.41% | 0.38% | 0.03% |
| KLACKla Corp. | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.00% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 0.44% | 0.31% | 0.13% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc. Class A | 0.56% | 0.14% | 0.42% |
32.1% of IVV is already inside ETHO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETHO or IVV?
ETHO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ETHO or IVV?
Over the past year ETHO returned +27.84% vs +19.36% for IVV, so ETHO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), ETHO annualized +12.36% vs +13.59% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ETHO or IVV?
ETHO has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ETHO -36.7% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both ETHO and IVV?
ETHO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ETHO and IVV?
32.1% of IVV's money is in holdings ETHO also owns. 32.1% of IVV's is in holdings ETHO also owns. They hold 73 positions in common, counted across the 284 positions we hold weights for in ETHO and 504 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETHO or IVV?
ETHO yields 0.70% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ETHO?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ETHO led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. ETHO is less concentrated, with 7.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.