ETHO vs VTI
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership US ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ETHO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETHO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $196M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 288 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +24.44% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.15% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.58% | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.26% | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 18, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
ETHO vs VTI Performance
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership US ETF (ETHO) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ETHO returned +36.15% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, ETHO is up 24.44% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Over three years, ETHO compounded at +17.58% per year against +21.85% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.26% and +12.44% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, ETHO has the edge at +12.66% annualized vs +8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETHO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for ETHO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETHO charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETHO currently yields 0.70% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ETHO and VTI share 234 holdings out of 2837 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETHO or VTI?
ETHO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ETHO or VTI?
Over the past year ETHO returned +36.15% vs +21.12% for VTI, so ETHO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), ETHO annualized +12.66% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ETHO or VTI?
ETHO has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ETHO -36.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ETHO and VTI?
ETHO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ETHO and VTI?
ETHO and VTI share 234 common holdings with a 9.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2837 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETHO or VTI?
ETHO yields 0.70% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.