ETHO vs VTI

ETHO vs VTI

Which is better, ETHO or VTI?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. ETHO led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricETHOVTI
Expense Ratio0.45%0.03%Best
AUM$192M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.69%1.03%
Holdings2883,543
YTD Return+19.52%Best+11.65%
1Y Return+26.52%Best+17.34%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.86%+20.35%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+6.12%+11.72%Best
Volatility (annualized)17.6%15.6%Best
Max Drawdown-36.7%-35.0%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$13,458$17,404Best
Fund FamilyAmplify ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 18, 2015May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 19, 2015 to Sep 10, 2026 (10.8 years).

ETHO vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.8 years both funds cover.

ETHO vs VTI Performance

Amplify Etho Climate Leadership US ETF (ETHO) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ETHO returned +26.52% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, ETHO is up 19.52% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.

Over three years, ETHO compounded at +15.86% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.12% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.07% annualized vs +12.17%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ETHO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for ETHO and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ETHO charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETHO currently yields 0.69% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

ETHO already in VTI83.1%

At least 83.1% of ETHO's money is in holdings VTI also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

Most of ETHO is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, ETHO as of Sep 1, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

236 positions in common, counted across the 286 positions we hold weights for in ETHO and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 288 and 3,543.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ETHOWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.0.37%6.32%5.95%
AAPLApple, Inc0.37%5.84%5.47%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 370.40%3.81%3.41%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0010.34%2.88%2.54%
VVisa Inc0.36%0.77%0.41%
MXLMaxlinear Inc1.00%0.01%0.99%
SLSSales Tax Asset-a 5 10/310.91%0.00%0.91%
MAMastercard Inc0.34%0.56%0.22%
KLACKla Corp.0.35%0.54%0.19%
TXG10x Genomics Inc0.86%0.00%0.86%

83.1% of ETHO is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ETHOVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ETHO or VTI?

ETHO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ETHO or VTI?

Over the past year ETHO returned +26.52% vs +17.34% for VTI, so ETHO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), ETHO annualized +12.17% vs +13.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ETHO or VTI?

ETHO has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ETHO -36.7% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both ETHO and VTI?

ETHO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between ETHO and VTI?

At least 83.1% of ETHO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 236 positions in common, counted across the 286 positions we hold weights for in ETHO and 2,787 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, ETHO or VTI?

ETHO yields 0.69% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than ETHO?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. ETHO led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.