FFND vs IVV
One Global ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FFND or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FFND is less concentrated, with 25.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFND | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $99M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 91 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +8.50% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.26% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.65% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.17% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.7% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -47.8% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,866 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.3%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | The Future Fund | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 24, 2021 to Sep 4, 2026 (5 years).
FFND vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.
FFND vs IVV Performance
One Global ETF (FFND) is an ETF from The Future Fund and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FFND returned +13.26% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, FFND is up 8.50% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, FFND compounded at +18.65% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +5.17% and +12.88% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.7% compared with 15.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.8% for FFND and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFND charges 1.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFND currently yields 0.60% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
49.9% of FFND's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 43.8% of IVV's money is in holdings FFND also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
36 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in FFND and 505 in IVV, against full books of 91 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 461 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FFND (55.6% of the fund), and 31 for FFND that do not appear in IVV (27.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFND | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 3.09% | 7.98% | 4.89% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.19% | 6.86% | 2.67% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.26% | 4.01% | 0.25% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 2.57% | 5.44% | 2.87% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 2.74% | 3.19% | 0.45% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.19% | 2.98% | 0.79% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 1.12% | 1.94% | 0.82% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.29% | 1.45% | 0.16% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.32% | 0.93% | 0.39% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.31% | 0.72% | 0.59% |
49.9% of FFND is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFND or IVV?
FFND has an expense ratio of 1.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFND or IVV?
Over the past year FFND returned +13.26% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFND or IVV?
FFND has been the more volatile fund at 22.7% annualized versus 15.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FFND -47.8% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both FFND and IVV?
FFND and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFND and IVV?
49.9% of FFND's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 43.8% of IVV's is in holdings FFND also owns. They hold 36 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in FFND and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFND or IVV?
FFND yields 0.60% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FFND?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FFND is less concentrated, with 25.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.