FFND vs JDIV
One Global ETF vs JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF
Which is better, FFND or JDIV?
Each has led over a different period.
JDIV has a lower expense ratio. FFND led over the full window, JDIV over 1Y. FFND is less concentrated, with 27.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 30.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFND | JDIV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.47%Best |
| AUM | $92M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.62% | 1.57% |
| Holdings | 177 | 193 |
| YTD Return | +1.19% | +3.56%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.68% | +6.30%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.23% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.41% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 10.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.9% | -13.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $13,034Best | $11,747 |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.3%Best | 30.3% |
| Fund Family | The Future Fund | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2021 | Sep 25, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 26, 2024 to Nov 6, 2026 (2.1 years).
FFND vs JDIV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
FFND vs JDIV Performance
One Global ETF (FFND) is an ETF from The Future Fund and JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF (JDIV) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year FFND returned +3.68% while JDIV returned +6.30%. Year to date, FFND is up 1.19% versus a gain of 3.56% for JDIV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 10.3% for JDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.9% for FFND and -13.3% for JDIV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFND charges 1.00% per year while JDIV charges 0.47%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $47 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFND currently yields 0.62% against 1.57% for JDIV.
Holdings Overlap
17.0% of FFND's money is in holdings JDIV also owns. 24.3% of JDIV's money is in holdings FFND also owns.
JDIV and FFND share little of their money.
11 positions in common, counted across the 86 positions we hold weights for in FFND and 86 in JDIV, against full books of 177 and 193.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 44 positions for JDIV that do not appear in our book for FFND (48.0% of the fund), and 58 for FFND that do not appear in JDIV (64.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFND | Weight in JDIV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.98% | 7.31% | 4.33% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 1.36% | 5.37% | 4.01% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.34% | 2.78% | 0.56% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.16% | 1.49% | 0.67% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.31% | 1.61% | 0.30% |
| SAF:PASafran Sa | 0.91% | 1.88% | 0.97% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 1.11% | 1.32% | 0.21% |
| 6758:JPSony Corp | 1.11% | 0.75% | 0.36% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 1.09% | 0.67% | 0.42% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 1.05% | 0.51% | 0.54% |
24.3% of JDIV is already inside FFND.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFND or JDIV?
FFND has an expense ratio of 1.00% while JDIV charges 0.47%. JDIV is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFND or JDIV?
Over the past year FFND returned +3.68% vs +6.30% for JDIV, so JDIV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFND annualized +13.45% vs +7.97% for JDIV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFND or JDIV?
FFND has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 10.3% for JDIV. Worst drawdown: FFND -18.9% vs JDIV -13.3%.
Should I hold both FFND and JDIV?
FFND and JDIV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFND and JDIV?
24.3% of JDIV's money is in holdings FFND also owns. 24.3% of JDIV's is in holdings FFND also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 86 positions we hold weights for in FFND and 86 in JDIV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFND or JDIV?
FFND yields 0.62% while JDIV yields 1.57%, so JDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JDIV better than FFND?
JDIV has a lower expense ratio. FFND led over the full window, JDIV over 1Y. FFND is less concentrated, with 27.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 30.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.