FSST vs QQQ
Fidelity Sustainable US Equity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSST | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $13M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.55% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 90 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +15.66% | +17.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.71% | +26.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.45% | +26.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FSST vs QQQ Performance
Fidelity Sustainable US Equity ETF (FSST) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FSST returned +12.71% while QQQ returned +26.39%. Year to date, FSST is up 15.66% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Over three years, FSST compounded at +19.45% per year against +26.08% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.05% annualized vs +11.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.4% for FSST. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.3% for FSST and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSST charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSST currently yields 1.55% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FSST and QQQ share 19 holdings out of 177 unique holdings combined, representing a 37.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSST or QQQ?
FSST has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FSST or QQQ?
Over the past year FSST returned +12.71% vs +26.39% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FSST annualized +11.54% vs +13.05% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FSST or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.4% for FSST. Worst drawdown: FSST -26.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FSST and QQQ?
FSST and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FSST and QQQ?
FSST and QQQ share 19 common holdings with a 37.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 177 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSST or QQQ?
FSST yields 1.55% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FSST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.