GAUD vs VYM
Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GAUD or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAUD | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $244,376.99 | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.61% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 31 | 613 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Guinness Atkinson Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 22, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 70 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. GAUD has data through Jun 26, 2026 and VYM through Sep 4, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAUD charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAUD currently yields 0.61% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
85.7% of GAUD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 15.3% of VYM's money is in holdings GAUD also owns.
Most of GAUD is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 91 days apart, GAUD as of Mar 31, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
26 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in GAUD and 603 in VYM, against full books of 31 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 544 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GAUD (82.1% of the fund), and 4 for GAUD that do not appear in VYM (9.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GAUD | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 4.15% | 2.54% | 1.61% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 3.56% | 1.93% | 1.63% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.42% | 1.85% | 1.57% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 3.78% | 1.31% | 2.47% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 3.88% | 1.13% | 2.75% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 3.44% | 1.42% | 2.02% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp Sedol 2522096 | 4.37% | 0.43% | 3.94% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 3.63% | 0.77% | 2.86% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv | 3.72% | 0.31% | 3.41% |
| HSYHershey Co. | 3.89% | 0.11% | 3.78% |
85.7% of GAUD is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAUD or VYM?
GAUD has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between GAUD and VYM?
85.7% of GAUD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 15.3% of VYM's is in holdings GAUD also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in GAUD and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAUD or VYM?
GAUD yields 0.61% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GAUD?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.