GAUD vs VTI
Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GAUD or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GAUD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $244,376.99 | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.61% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 31 | 3,524 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Guinness Atkinson Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 22, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 98 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. GAUD has data through Jun 26, 2026 and VTI through Oct 2, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GAUD charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GAUD currently yields 0.61% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.4% of GAUD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 5.5% of VTI's money is in holdings GAUD also owns.
Most of GAUD is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 122 days apart, GAUD as of Mar 31, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
30 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in GAUD and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 31 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,121 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GAUD (92.0% of the fund), and 1 for GAUD that do not appear in VTI (3.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GAUD | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 4.15% | 0.86% | 3.29% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp Sedol 2522096 | 4.37% | 0.19% | 4.18% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 3.88% | 0.35% | 3.53% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 3.78% | 0.42% | 3.36% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 3.56% | 0.57% | 2.99% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.42% | 0.61% | 2.81% |
| HSYHershey Co. | 3.89% | 0.04% | 3.85% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 3.44% | 0.47% | 2.97% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 3.63% | 0.26% | 3.37% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv | 3.72% | 0.11% | 3.61% |
95.4% of GAUD is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GAUD or VTI?
GAUD has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between GAUD and VTI?
95.4% of GAUD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 5.5% of VTI's is in holdings GAUD also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in GAUD and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GAUD or VTI?
GAUD yields 0.61% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GAUD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.