GLOF vs VYM
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GLOF or VYM?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GLOF led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. GLOF is less concentrated, with 24.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLOF | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $197M | $83.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.53% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 715 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +16.84%Best | +11.61% |
| 1Y Return | +20.80%Best | +15.90% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.54%Best | +18.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.25%Best | +11.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 14.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,629Best | $17,435 |
| Top 10 Weight | 24.4%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 28, 2015 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 4, 2015 to Oct 9, 2026 (11.4 years).
GLOF vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.4 years both funds cover.
GLOF vs VYM Performance
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLOF returned +20.80% while VYM returned +15.90%. Year to date, GLOF is up 16.84% versus a gain of 11.61% for VYM.
Over three years, GLOF compounded at +23.54% per year against +18.72% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.25% and +11.76% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, GLOF has the edge at +9.23% annualized vs +8.97%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLOF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 14.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for GLOF and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLOF charges 0.20% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $4 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLOF currently yields 1.53% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
20.5% of GLOF's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 60.2% of VYM's money is in holdings GLOF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
94 positions in common, counted across the 664 positions we hold weights for in GLOF and 557 in VYM, against full books of 715 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 434 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GLOF (36.9% of the fund), and 123 for GLOF that do not appear in VYM (41.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLOF | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.68% | 7.35% | 5.67% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.95% | 3.82% | 2.87% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.75% | 2.51% | 1.76% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.37% | 2.63% | 2.26% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.70% | 1.80% | 1.10% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.33% | 1.86% | 1.53% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.21% | 1.66% | 1.45% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.55% | 1.31% | 0.76% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.44% | 1.37% | 0.93% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.19% | 1.50% | 1.31% |
60.2% of VYM is already inside GLOF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLOF or VYM?
GLOF has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GLOF or VYM?
Over the past year GLOF returned +20.80% vs +15.90% for VYM, so GLOF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), GLOF annualized +9.23% vs +8.97% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GLOF or VYM?
GLOF has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 14.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GLOF -36.7% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both GLOF and VYM?
GLOF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GLOF and VYM?
60.2% of VYM's money is in holdings GLOF also owns. 60.2% of VYM's is in holdings GLOF also owns. They hold 94 positions in common, counted across the 664 positions we hold weights for in GLOF and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLOF or VYM?
GLOF yields 1.53% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GLOF?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GLOF led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. GLOF is less concentrated, with 24.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.