GRNY vs XAIW

GRNY vs XAIW

Which is better, GRNY or XAIW?

XAIW costs less.

XAIW has a lower expense ratio. GRNY is less concentrated, with 26.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.7%.

Lower Fees: XAIWLess Concentrated: GRNY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGRNYXAIW
Expense Ratio0.75%0.59%Best
AUM$3.8B$2M
Dividend Yield0.13%0.00%
Holdings8652
YTD Return+6.02%Best-13.79%
1Y Return+4.02%-
Top 10 Weight26.9%Best65.7%
Fund FamilyFundstrat CapitalHarbor Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionNov 7, 2024Aug 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

GRNY vs XAIW growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare GRNY against instead:GRNY vs SPYGRNY vs QQQGRNY vs VOOGRNY vs VTIXAIW against:XAIW vs VXUS

GRNY vs XAIW Performance

Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY) is an ETF from Fundstrat Capital and SpaceXAI Lab Ecosystem ETF (XAIW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, GRNY is up 6.02% versus a loss of 13.79% for XAIW.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GRNY charges 0.75% per year while XAIW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $59 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRNY currently yields 0.13% against 0.00% for XAIW.

Holdings Overlap

GRNY already in XAIW19.2%
XAIW already in GRNY47.5%

19.2% of GRNY's money is in holdings XAIW also owns. 47.5% of XAIW's money is in holdings GRNY also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

8 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in GRNY and 25 in XAIW, against full books of 86 and 52.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 12 positions for XAIW that do not appear in our book for GRNY (37.5% of the fund), and 34 for GRNY that do not appear in XAIW (80.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GRNYWeight in XAIWDifference
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies2.67%20.56%17.89%
NVDANvidia Corp2.35%7.68%5.33%
ORCLOracle Corp - Common2.23%5.87%3.64%
TSLATesla Inc2.45%4.73%2.28%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp2.66%3.34%0.68%
GEVGe Vernova2.24%1.96%0.28%
CATCaterpillar Inc2.13%2.01%0.12%
INTCIntel Corp.2.45%1.40%1.05%

47.5% of XAIW is already inside GRNY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

GRNYXAIW

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GRNY or XAIW?

GRNY has an expense ratio of 0.75% while XAIW charges 0.59%. XAIW is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between GRNY and XAIW?

47.5% of XAIW's money is in holdings GRNY also owns. 47.5% of XAIW's is in holdings GRNY also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in GRNY and 25 in XAIW.

Which pays a higher dividend, GRNY or XAIW?

GRNY yields 0.13% while XAIW yields 0.00%, so GRNY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XAIW better than GRNY?

XAIW has a lower expense ratio. GRNY is less concentrated, with 26.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.