GXPS vs IVV
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GXPS or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPS | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $73M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.26% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 33 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +6.42% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.31% | +16.32%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.03% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.2% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $10,446 | $12,324Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 81.6% | 38.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026 (1.2 years).
GXPS vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
GXPS vs IVV Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GXPS returned +7.31% while IVV returned +16.32%. Year to date, GXPS is up 6.42% versus a gain of 13.60% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 11.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.2% for GXPS and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPS charges 0.15% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPS currently yields 1.26% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
98.3% of GXPS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.3% of IVV's money is in holdings GXPS also owns.
Most of GXPS is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
28 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in GXPS and 505 in IVV, against full books of 33 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 469 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GXPS (94.9% of the fund), and 1 for GXPS that do not appear in IVV (0.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GXPS | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 16.17% | 0.71% | 15.46% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 13.84% | 0.61% | 13.23% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 11.79% | 0.52% | 11.27% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 11.67% | 0.51% | 11.16% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 10.27% | 0.45% | 9.82% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 6.42% | 0.28% | 6.14% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 3.97% | 0.17% | 3.80% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv | 2.75% | 0.12% | 2.63% |
| TGTTARGET CORP | 2.42% | 0.11% | 2.31% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 2.27% | 0.11% | 2.16% |
98.3% of GXPS is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPS or IVV?
GXPS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GXPS or IVV?
Over the past year GXPS returned +7.31% vs +16.32% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPS annualized +3.70% vs +19.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GXPS or IVV?
GXPS has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 11.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GXPS -9.2% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both GXPS and IVV?
GXPS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPS and IVV?
98.3% of GXPS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.3% of IVV's is in holdings GXPS also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in GXPS and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPS or IVV?
GXPS yields 1.26% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GXPS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GXPS?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.