GXPS vs IVV
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $69M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.25% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.89% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.90% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
GXPS vs IVV Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GXPS returned +6.90% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, GXPS is up 10.89% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.2% for GXPS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.17. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPS charges 0.15% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPS currently yields 1.25% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GXPS and IVV share 16 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPS or IVV?
GXPS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GXPS or IVV?
Over the past year GXPS returned +6.90% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPS annualized +8.15% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GXPS or IVV?
GXPS has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GXPS -9.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GXPS and IVV?
GXPS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.17, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPS and IVV?
GXPS and IVV share 16 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPS or IVV?
GXPS yields 1.25% while IVV yields 1.10%, so GXPS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.