GXPS vs VTI
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $69M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.25% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.89% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.90% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
GXPS vs VTI Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXPS returned +6.90% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, GXPS is up 10.89% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.2% for GXPS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.2% for GXPS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPS charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPS currently yields 1.25% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GXPS and VTI share 16 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPS or VTI?
GXPS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GXPS or VTI?
Over the past year GXPS returned +6.90% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPS annualized +8.15% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GXPS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.2% for GXPS. Worst drawdown: GXPS -9.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GXPS and VTI?
GXPS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPS and VTI?
GXPS and VTI share 16 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPS or VTI?
GXPS yields 1.25% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GXPS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.