GXPS vs VTI
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GXPS or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $73M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.26% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 33 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +8.41% | +14.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.03% | +16.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.74% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.2% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $10,634 | $12,354Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 81.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2025 to Oct 7, 2026 (1.2 years).
GXPS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
GXPS vs VTI Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXPS returned +9.03% while VTI returned +16.92%. Year to date, GXPS is up 8.41% versus a gain of 14.27% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 11.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.2% for GXPS and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.22. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPS charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPS currently yields 1.26% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.3% of GXPS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.0% of VTI's money is in holdings GXPS also owns.
Most of GXPS is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, GXPS as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
28 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in GXPS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 33 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,122 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GXPS (93.5% of the fund), and 1 for GXPS that do not appear in VTI (0.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GXPS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 16.17% | 0.68% | 15.49% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 13.84% | 0.59% | 13.25% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 11.79% | 0.42% | 11.37% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 11.67% | 0.47% | 11.20% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 10.27% | 0.41% | 9.86% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 6.42% | 0.26% | 6.16% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 3.97% | 0.16% | 3.81% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv | 2.75% | 0.11% | 2.64% |
| TGTTARGET CORP | 2.42% | 0.09% | 2.33% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 2.27% | 0.10% | 2.17% |
98.3% of GXPS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPS or VTI?
GXPS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GXPS or VTI?
Over the past year GXPS returned +9.03% vs +16.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPS annualized +5.26% vs +19.26% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GXPS or VTI?
GXPS has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 11.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GXPS -9.2% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both GXPS and VTI?
GXPS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.22, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPS and VTI?
98.3% of GXPS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.0% of VTI's is in holdings GXPS also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in GXPS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPS or VTI?
GXPS yields 1.26% while VTI yields 1.03%, so GXPS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GXPS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.