HBTA vs IVV
Horizon Expedition Plus ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HBTA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.86% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $299M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 208 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +5.55% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.60% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Horizon Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 22, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
HBTA vs IVV Performance
Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) is a ETF from Horizon Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HBTA returned +21.60% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, HBTA is up 5.55% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HBTA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.8% for HBTA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HBTA charges 0.86% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $86 vs $3 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HBTA currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HBTA and IVV share 193 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 46.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HBTA or IVV?
HBTA has an expense ratio of 0.86% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $83 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HBTA or IVV?
Over the past year HBTA returned +21.60% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HBTA annualized +0.14% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HBTA or IVV?
HBTA has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HBTA -23.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HBTA and IVV?
HBTA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HBTA and IVV?
HBTA and IVV share 193 common holdings with a 46.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HBTA or IVV?
HBTA yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.