HELX vs IVV
Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. HELX delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HELX | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $31M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 65 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +16.35% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +44.57% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.36% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -4.54% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 25, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
HELX vs IVV Performance
Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HELX returned +44.57% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, HELX is up 16.35% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, HELX compounded at +12.36% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -4.54% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, HELX has the edge at +9.29% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HELX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for HELX and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HELX charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HELX currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HELX and IVV share 11 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HELX or IVV?
HELX has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HELX or IVV?
Over the past year HELX returned +44.57% vs +20.94% for IVV, so HELX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HELX annualized +9.29% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HELX or IVV?
HELX has been the more volatile fund at 25.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HELX -58.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HELX and IVV?
HELX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HELX and IVV?
HELX and IVV share 11 common holdings with a 2.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HELX or IVV?
HELX yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.