ILCB vs IVV
iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. ILCB offers more diversification with 533 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ILCB | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.3B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 533 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +13.33% | +13.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.64% | +19.95% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.42% | +21.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.29% | +12.82% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 28, 2004 | May 15, 2000 |
ILCB vs IVV Performance
iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF (ILCB) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ILCB returned +19.64% while IVV returned +19.95%. Year to date, ILCB is up 13.33% versus a gain of 13.25% for IVV.
Over three years, ILCB compounded at +21.42% per year against +21.26% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.29% and +12.82% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, ILCB has the edge at +9.65% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.7% for ILCB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.8% for ILCB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ILCB charges 0.03% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, ILCB currently yields 0.99% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ILCB and IVV share 410 holdings out of 594 unique holdings combined, representing a 91.2% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ILCB or IVV?
ILCB has an expense ratio of 0.03% while IVV charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ILCB or IVV?
Over the past year ILCB returned +19.64% vs +19.95% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), ILCB annualized +9.65% vs +7.01% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ILCB or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.7% for ILCB. Worst drawdown: ILCB -52.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ILCB and IVV?
ILCB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ILCB and IVV?
ILCB and IVV share 410 common holdings with a 91.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 594 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ILCB or IVV?
ILCB yields 0.99% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.