ILCB vs VOO
iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. ILCB offers more diversification with 533 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ILCB | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.3B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 533 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +13.33% | +13.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.64% | +19.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.42% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.29% | +12.81% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 28, 2004 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ILCB vs VOO Performance
iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF (ILCB) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ILCB returned +19.64% while VOO returned +19.96%. Year to date, ILCB is up 13.33% versus a gain of 13.25% for VOO.
Over three years, ILCB compounded at +21.42% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.29% and +12.81% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.49% annualized vs +9.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ILCB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.8% for ILCB and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ILCB charges 0.03% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, ILCB currently yields 0.99% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ILCB and VOO share 411 holdings out of 593 unique holdings combined, representing a 92.2% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ILCB or VOO?
ILCB has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VOO charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ILCB or VOO?
Over the past year ILCB returned +19.64% vs +19.96% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ILCB annualized +9.65% vs +13.49% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ILCB or VOO?
ILCB has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ILCB -52.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ILCB and VOO?
ILCB and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ILCB and VOO?
ILCB and VOO share 411 common holdings with a 92.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 593 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ILCB or VOO?
ILCB yields 0.99% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.