IQSU vs IVV
NYLIM Candriam US Large Cap Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IQSU or IVV?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IQSU led over 1Y and the full window, IVV over 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IQSU | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $347M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.97% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 264 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +16.49%Best | +13.60% |
| 1Y Return | +19.73%Best | +16.32% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.00% | +23.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.69% | +14.03%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 16.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -31.3%Best | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,173 | $19,279Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.0% | 38.1%Best |
| Fund Family | New York Life Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 17, 2019 to Oct 2, 2026 (6.8 years).
IQSU vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.8 years both funds cover.
IQSU vs IVV Performance
NYLIM Candriam US Large Cap Equity ETF (IQSU) is an ETF from New York Life Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IQSU returned +19.73% while IVV returned +16.32%. Year to date, IQSU is up 16.49% versus a gain of 13.60% for IVV.
Over three years, IQSU compounded at +21.00% per year against +23.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.69% and +14.03% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, IQSU has the edge at +15.68% annualized vs +15.24%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IQSU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 16.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.3% for IQSU and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IQSU charges 0.09% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IQSU currently yields 0.97% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
94.6% of IQSU's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 56.7% of IVV's money is in holdings IQSU also owns.
Most of IQSU is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
243 positions in common, counted across the 260 positions we hold weights for in IQSU and 505 in IVV, against full books of 264 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 255 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IQSU (42.6% of the fund), and 11 for IQSU that do not appear in IVV (1.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IQSU | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.45% | 7.39% | 2.06% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.41% | 5.57% | 0.16% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.94% | 3.80% | 1.14% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 5.16% | 3.00% | 2.16% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 4.45% | 2.40% | 2.05% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.14% | 1.66% | 1.48% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 3.15% | 1.56% | 1.59% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.18% | 1.27% | 0.91% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 1.75% | 0.93% | 0.82% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.32% | 0.77% | 0.55% |
94.6% of IQSU is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IQSU or IVV?
IQSU has an expense ratio of 0.09% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IQSU or IVV?
Over the past year IQSU returned +19.73% vs +16.32% for IVV, so IQSU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IQSU annualized +15.68% vs +15.24% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IQSU or IVV?
IQSU has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 16.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IQSU -31.3% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both IQSU and IVV?
IQSU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IQSU and IVV?
94.6% of IQSU's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 56.7% of IVV's is in holdings IQSU also owns. They hold 243 positions in common, counted across the 260 positions we hold weights for in IQSU and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IQSU or IVV?
IQSU yields 0.97% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IQSU?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IQSU led over 1Y and the full window, IVV over 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.