IVV vs JGLO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JGLO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.47% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $6.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.13% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 93 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +9.51% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +13.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +17.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 11.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -16.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 13, 2023 |
IVV vs JGLO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while JGLO returned +13.19%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 9.51% for JGLO.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.19% per year against +17.17% for JGLO. Across the full 3-year window we track, JGLO has the edge at +17.17% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.1% for JGLO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.1% for JGLO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JGLO charges 0.47%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $47 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.13% for JGLO.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and JGLO share 44 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 36.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JGLO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JGLO charges 0.47%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JGLO?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +13.19% for JGLO, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +17.17% for JGLO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JGLO?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.1% for JGLO. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JGLO -16.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and JGLO?
IVV and JGLO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JGLO?
IVV and JGLO share 44 common holdings with a 36.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JGLO?
IVV yields 1.10% while JGLO yields 1.13%, so JGLO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.