IVV vs QRFT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap ETF
Which is better, IVV or QRFT?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QRFT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QRFT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 508 | 301 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6%Best | 17.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -30.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 7.2 years | $28,275 | $28,683Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1%Best | 45.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | QRAFT AI ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 20, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 80 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Oct 9, 2026 and QRFT through Jul 21, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 7.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2019 to Jul 21, 2026 (7.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QRFT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 16.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -30.2% for QRFT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QRFT charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.25% for QRFT.
Holdings Overlap
69.1% of IVV's money is in holdings QRFT also owns. 95.7% of QRFT's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of QRFT is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 134 days apart, IVV as of Sep 11, 2026 and QRFT as of Apr 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
240 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 294 in QRFT, against full books of 508 and 301.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 41 positions for QRFT that do not appear in our book for IVV (2.2% of the fund), and 256 for IVV that do not appear in QRFT (30.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in QRFT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.00% | 9.65% | 1.65% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.39% | 9.21% | 1.82% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.80% | 5.92% | 2.12% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 4.70% | 1.70% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.59% | 4.11% | 1.52% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.15% | 2.76% | 0.61% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 3.26% | 1.70% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.66% | 1.72% | 0.06% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.34% | 2.00% | 0.66% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.44% | 1.69% | 0.25% |
95.7% of QRFT is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QRFT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QRFT charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or QRFT?
QRFT has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 16.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs QRFT -30.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and QRFT?
IVV and QRFT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QRFT?
95.7% of QRFT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 95.7% of QRFT's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 240 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 294 in QRFT.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QRFT?
IVV yields 1.06% while QRFT yields 0.25%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QRFT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QRFT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.