QRFT vs VXUS
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, QRFT or VXUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. QRFT led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QRFT | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 301 | 8,747 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 16.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -30.2%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 7.2 years | $28,683Best | $19,514 |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 59 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. QRFT has data through Jul 21, 2026 and VXUS through Sep 18, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 7.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2019 to Jul 21, 2026 (7.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QRFT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 16.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.2% for QRFT and -35.1% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QRFT charges 0.75% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $5 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QRFT currently yields 0.25% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.4% of QRFT's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 92 days apart, QRFT as of Apr 30, 2026 and VXUS as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
4 positions in common, counted across the 294 positions we hold weights for in QRFT and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 301 and 8,747.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QRFT and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QRFT or VXUS?
QRFT has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, QRFT or VXUS?
QRFT has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 16.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: QRFT -30.2% vs VXUS -35.1%.
Should I hold both QRFT and VXUS?
QRFT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QRFT or VXUS?
QRFT yields 0.25% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than QRFT?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. QRFT led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.