IVV vs TACU

IVV vs TACU

Which is better, IVV or TACU?

TACU costs less.

TACU has a lower expense ratio. TACU is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.

Lower Fees: TACULess Concentrated: TACU

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVTACU
Expense Ratio0.03%0.00%Best
AUM$876.4B$16M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings508559
YTD Return+12.27%Best+12.12%
1Y Return+17.04%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.24%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.08%-
Top 10 Weight37.8%35.0%Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)T.Rowe Price
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 15, 2000Dec 10, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs TACU growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs TACU Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and T. Rowe Price Active Core US Equity ETF (TACU) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 12.12% for TACU.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while TACU charges 0.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $0 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for TACU.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in TACU94.3%
TACU already in IVV90.2%

94.3% of IVV's money is in holdings TACU also owns. 90.2% of TACU's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

Most of IVV is already inside TACU. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

390 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 574 in TACU, against full books of 508 and 559.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 147 positions for TACU that do not appear in our book for IVV (6.5% of the fund), and 93 for IVV that do not appear in TACU (4.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in TACUDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.07%7.36%0.71%
AAPLApple, Inc7.02%6.38%0.64%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.69%5.35%0.34%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.84%3.56%0.28%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.00%3.47%0.47%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.65%2.50%0.15%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.39%1.71%0.68%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.90%1.80%0.10%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.63%1.50%0.13%
TSLATesla Inc1.56%1.32%0.24%

94.3% of IVV is already inside TACU.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVTACU

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or TACU?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TACU charges 0.00%. TACU is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TACU?

94.3% of IVV's money is in holdings TACU also owns. 90.2% of TACU's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 390 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 574 in TACU.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TACU?

IVV yields 1.06% while TACU yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TACU better than IVV?

TACU has a lower expense ratio. TACU is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.