JQTY vs SCHD
Jensen US Quality Index ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, JQTY or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. JQTY is less concentrated, with 32.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JQTY | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $119.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.96% |
| Holdings | 100 | 204 |
| YTD Return | -0.03% | +29.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +37.26% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.87% |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.2%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Jensen Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2026 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
JQTY vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
JQTY vs SCHD Performance
Jensen US Quality Index ETF (JQTY) is an ETF from Jensen Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, JQTY is down 0.03% versus a gain of 29.95% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JQTY charges 0.25% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $6 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JQTY currently yields 0.00% against 2.96% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
15.7% of JQTY's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 56.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings JQTY also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in JQTY and 98 in SCHD, against full books of 100 and 204.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 100 and 98 positions we hold weights for.
SCHD holds 79 positions JQTY does not, 42.9% of the fund.
Largest: CVX 4.32%, COP 4.27%, MRK 4.00%, ABT 3.84%, BMY 3.02%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JQTY | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.27% | 4.36% | 3.09% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.33% | 4.28% | 2.95% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 1.08% | 4.53% | 3.45% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.15% | 4.07% | 2.92% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 1.09% | 3.96% | 2.87% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.83% | 4.18% | 3.35% |
| HDHome Depot Inc | 1.13% | 3.82% | 2.69% |
| PEPPepsico Inc | 0.84% | 3.79% | 2.95% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.85% | 3.64% | 2.79% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 1.05% | 3.28% | 2.23% |
56.9% of SCHD is already inside JQTY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JQTY or SCHD?
JQTY has an expense ratio of 0.25% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between JQTY and SCHD?
56.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings JQTY also owns. 56.9% of SCHD's is in holdings JQTY also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in JQTY and 98 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, JQTY or SCHD?
JQTY yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 2.96%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than JQTY?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. JQTY is less concentrated, with 32.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.