KOMP vs QQQ
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. KOMP offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KOMP | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $2.8B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.20% | +17.30% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.53% | +24.93% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.80% | +26.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.76% | +15.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 19, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
KOMP vs QQQ Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year KOMP returned +22.53% while QQQ returned +24.93%. Year to date, KOMP is up 13.20% versus a gain of 17.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, KOMP compounded at +19.80% per year against +26.19% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +3.76% and +15.34% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.06% annualized vs +12.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 24.9% for KOMP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for KOMP and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KOMP charges 0.20% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $18 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KOMP currently yields 1.58% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
KOMP and QQQ share 37 holdings out of 568 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KOMP or QQQ?
KOMP has an expense ratio of 0.20% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KOMP or QQQ?
Over the past year KOMP returned +22.53% vs +24.93% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), KOMP annualized +12.48% vs +13.06% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KOMP or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 24.9% for KOMP. Worst drawdown: KOMP -50.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both KOMP and QQQ?
KOMP and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KOMP and QQQ?
KOMP and QQQ share 37 common holdings with a 8.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 568 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KOMP or QQQ?
KOMP yields 1.58% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so KOMP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.