KOMP vs VOO
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. KOMP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KOMP | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.8B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +15.95% | +13.73% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.50% | +21.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.85% | +22.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.22% | +13.31% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 19, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
KOMP vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KOMP returned +25.50% while VOO returned +21.53%. Year to date, KOMP is up 15.95% versus a gain of 13.73% for VOO.
Over three years, KOMP compounded at +20.85% per year against +22.60% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.22% and +13.31% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KOMP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for KOMP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KOMP charges 0.20% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KOMP currently yields 1.58% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
KOMP and VOO share 118 holdings out of 890 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KOMP or VOO?
KOMP has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KOMP or VOO?
Over the past year KOMP returned +25.50% vs +21.53% for VOO, so KOMP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), KOMP annualized +12.83% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KOMP or VOO?
KOMP has been the more volatile fund at 24.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: KOMP -50.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both KOMP and VOO?
KOMP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KOMP and VOO?
KOMP and VOO share 118 common holdings with a 13.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 890 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KOMP or VOO?
KOMP yields 1.58% while VOO yields 1.08%, so KOMP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.