KOMP vs SPY
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. KOMP delivered stronger 1-year returns. KOMP offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KOMP | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $2.8B | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +15.95% | +13.70% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.50% | +21.44% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.85% | +22.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.22% | +13.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 19, 2018 | Jan 22, 1993 |
KOMP vs SPY Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year KOMP returned +25.50% while SPY returned +21.44%. Year to date, KOMP is up 15.95% versus a gain of 13.70% for SPY.
Over three years, KOMP compounded at +20.85% per year against +22.50% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +4.22% and +13.24% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, KOMP has the edge at +12.83% annualized vs +8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KOMP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.9% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for KOMP and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KOMP charges 0.20% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $9 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KOMP currently yields 1.58% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
KOMP and SPY share 118 holdings out of 889 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KOMP or SPY?
KOMP has an expense ratio of 0.20% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KOMP or SPY?
Over the past year KOMP returned +25.50% vs +21.44% for SPY, so KOMP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), KOMP annualized +12.83% vs +8.84% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KOMP or SPY?
KOMP has been the more volatile fund at 24.9% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: KOMP -50.1% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both KOMP and SPY?
KOMP and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KOMP and SPY?
KOMP and SPY share 118 common holdings with a 13.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 889 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KOMP or SPY?
KOMP yields 1.58% while SPY yields 1.01%, so KOMP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.