KOMP vs VTI
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KOMP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KOMP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.8B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +15.95% | +14.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.50% | +22.11% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.85% | +22.37% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.22% | +12.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 19, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
KOMP vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KOMP returned +25.50% while VTI returned +22.11%. Year to date, KOMP is up 15.95% versus a gain of 14.31% for VTI.
Over three years, KOMP compounded at +20.85% per year against +22.37% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.22% and +12.40% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, KOMP has the edge at +12.83% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KOMP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for KOMP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KOMP charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KOMP currently yields 1.58% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KOMP and VTI share 332 holdings out of 2958 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KOMP or VTI?
KOMP has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KOMP or VTI?
Over the past year KOMP returned +25.50% vs +22.11% for VTI, so KOMP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), KOMP annualized +12.83% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KOMP or VTI?
KOMP has been the more volatile fund at 24.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KOMP -50.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KOMP and VTI?
KOMP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KOMP and VTI?
KOMP and VTI share 332 common holdings with a 13.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2958 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KOMP or VTI?
KOMP yields 1.58% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KOMP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.