KOMP vs VTI
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KOMP or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KOMP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.7B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 508 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +10.53% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.69% | +20.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.00% | +20.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.02% | +11.81%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.7% | 17.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,052 | $17,474Best |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 19, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2018 to Sep 4, 2026 (7.9 years).
KOMP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
KOMP vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KOMP returned +18.69% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, KOMP is up 10.53% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Over three years, KOMP compounded at +18.00% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.02% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.64% annualized vs +12.06%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KOMP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.7% compared with 17.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for KOMP and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KOMP charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KOMP currently yields 1.58% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 69.8% of KOMP's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
332 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in KOMP and 2,788 in VTI, against full books of 508 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KOMP | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 0.73% | 6.32% | 5.59% |
| AAPLApple Inc Ord | 0.12% | 5.84% | 5.72% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 0.21% | 3.81% | 3.60% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.12% | 2.46% | 2.34% |
| GOOGAlphabet, Inc., Class C | 0.23% | 2.27% | 2.04% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 0.62% | 1.70% | 1.08% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 0.61% | 1.63% | 1.02% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.40% | 1.79% | 1.39% |
| DDD3D Systems Corporation | 1.32% | 0.00% | 1.32% |
| KLACKla Corp. | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.01% |
69.8% of KOMP is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KOMP or VTI?
KOMP has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KOMP or VTI?
Over the past year KOMP returned +18.69% vs +20.00% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), KOMP annualized +12.06% vs +14.64% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KOMP or VTI?
KOMP has been the more volatile fund at 24.7% annualized versus 17.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KOMP -50.1% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both KOMP and VTI?
KOMP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KOMP and VTI?
At least 69.8% of KOMP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 332 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in KOMP and 2,788 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, KOMP or VTI?
KOMP yields 1.58% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KOMP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KOMP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.