LRGC vs VTI
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LRGC or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LRGC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.3B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 74 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +9.65% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.04% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.41% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7%Best | 12.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $17,458 | $17,887Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.1% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3 years).
LRGC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
LRGC vs VTI Performance
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LRGC returned +12.04% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, LRGC is up 9.65% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, LRGC compounded at +20.41% per year against +21.01% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 12.7% for LRGC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for LRGC and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LRGC charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRGC currently yields 0.52% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.3% of LRGC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 43.5% of VTI's money is in holdings LRGC also owns.
Most of LRGC is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
64 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in LRGC and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 74 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,087 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for LRGC (54.1% of the fund), and 2 for LRGC that do not appear in VTI (1.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LRGC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.09% | 6.40% | 1.69% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.47% | 6.29% | 0.82% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.60% | 4.79% | 1.81% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.97% | 3.65% | 1.32% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 6.04% | 2.31% | 3.73% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.15% | 2.56% | 0.59% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.84% | 1.70% | 1.14% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 3.32% | 0.83% | 2.49% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.53% | 0.89% | 0.64% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 1.71% | 0.55% | 1.16% |
95.3% of LRGC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LRGC or VTI?
LRGC has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LRGC or VTI?
Over the past year LRGC returned +12.04% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LRGC or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 12.7% for LRGC. Worst drawdown: LRGC -19.4% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both LRGC and VTI?
LRGC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LRGC and VTI?
95.3% of LRGC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 43.5% of VTI's is in holdings LRGC also owns. They hold 64 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in LRGC and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, LRGC or VTI?
LRGC yields 0.52% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LRGC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.