LRGC vs VOO
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, LRGC or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LRGC | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.3B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 74 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +10.47% | +12.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.99% | +16.35%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.70% | +22.92%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.55% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $17,497 | $18,007Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.1% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Sep 28, 2026 (3 years).
LRGC vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
LRGC vs VOO Performance
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LRGC returned +12.99% while VOO returned +16.35%. Year to date, LRGC is up 10.47% versus a gain of 12.67% for VOO.
Over three years, LRGC compounded at +21.70% per year against +22.92% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LRGC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 12.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for LRGC and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LRGC charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRGC currently yields 0.52% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
92.7% of LRGC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 49.1% of VOO's money is in holdings LRGC also owns.
Most of LRGC is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
59 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in LRGC and 494 in VOO, against full books of 74 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 428 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for LRGC (50.0% of the fund), and 6 for LRGC that do not appear in VOO (3.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LRGC | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.09% | 7.55% | 0.54% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.47% | 7.05% | 1.58% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.60% | 5.36% | 1.24% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.97% | 4.13% | 0.84% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 6.04% | 2.62% | 3.42% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.15% | 2.86% | 0.29% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.84% | 1.90% | 0.94% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 3.32% | 0.93% | 2.39% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.53% | 1.00% | 0.53% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 1.71% | 0.63% | 1.08% |
92.7% of LRGC is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LRGC or VOO?
LRGC has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LRGC or VOO?
Over the past year LRGC returned +12.99% vs +16.35% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LRGC or VOO?
LRGC has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 12.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LRGC -19.4% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both LRGC and VOO?
LRGC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LRGC and VOO?
92.7% of LRGC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 49.1% of VOO's is in holdings LRGC also owns. They hold 59 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in LRGC and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, LRGC or VOO?
LRGC yields 0.52% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than LRGC?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.