LRGC vs VOO
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LRGC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.3B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.54% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 74 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.54% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.89% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.28% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LRGC vs VOO Performance
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is a ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LRGC returned +17.89% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, LRGC is up 12.54% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, LRGC compounded at +22.28% per year against +21.55% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, LRGC has the edge at +22.28% annualized vs +13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.8% for LRGC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for LRGC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LRGC charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRGC currently yields 0.54% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LRGC and VOO share 60 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 45.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LRGC or VOO?
LRGC has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LRGC or VOO?
Over the past year LRGC returned +17.89% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LRGC annualized +22.28% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LRGC or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.8% for LRGC. Worst drawdown: LRGC -19.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LRGC and VOO?
LRGC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between LRGC and VOO?
LRGC and VOO share 60 common holdings with a 45.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LRGC or VOO?
LRGC yields 0.54% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.