LRND vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. LRND delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: LRNDMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLRNDVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.14%0.03%
AUM$388M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.42%1.07%
Holdings1103,543
YTD Return+15.70%+13.87%
1Y Return+26.82%+23.31%
3Y Return (annualized)+22.85%+21.17%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.23%
Volatility (annualized)18.2%15.3%
Max Drawdown-25.4%-56.6%
Fund FamilyINDEXIQ ETF TRUSTVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 8, 2022May 24, 2001

LRND vs VTI Performance

NYLI US Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) is a ETF from INDEXIQ ETF TRUST and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LRND returned +26.82% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, LRND is up 15.70% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.

Over three years, LRND compounded at +22.85% per year against +21.17% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, LRND has the edge at +16.18% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

LRND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for LRND and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LRND charges 0.14% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $3 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRND currently yields 0.42% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

36.2%overlap

LRND and VTI share 93 holdings out of 2798 unique holdings combined, representing a 36.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in LRNDWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA14.33%6.32%8.01%
AAPL13.14%5.84%7.30%
MSFT10.13%3.81%6.32%
GOOGLProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
LLYProProPro
METAProProPro
LRCXProProPro
AMATProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See all 10 holdings LRND shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LRND or VTI?

LRND has an expense ratio of 0.14% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.

Which performed better, LRND or VTI?

Over the past year LRND returned +26.82% vs +23.31% for VTI, so LRND leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), LRND annualized +16.18% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, LRND or VTI?

LRND has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LRND -25.4% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both LRND and VTI?

LRND and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between LRND and VTI?

LRND and VTI share 93 common holdings with a 36.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2798 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, LRND or VTI?

LRND yields 0.42% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.