MGK vs VOO
Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, MGK or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MGK led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MGK | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $32.4B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 55 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +8.66% | +11.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.40% | +15.60%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.03%Best | +20.82% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.99%Best | +12.60% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.0% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,416Best | $18,101 |
| Top 10 Weight | 67.1% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 16, 2026 (16 years).
MGK vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
MGK vs VOO Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MGK returned +12.40% while VOO returned +15.60%. Year to date, MGK is up 8.66% versus a gain of 11.01% for VOO.
Over three years, MGK compounded at +24.03% per year against +20.82% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.99% and +12.60% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, MGK has the edge at +16.30% annualized vs +13.30%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MGK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for MGK and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MGK charges 0.05% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MGK currently yields 0.33% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
99.1% of MGK's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 50.7% of VOO's money is in holdings MGK also owns.
Most of MGK is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
55 positions in common, counted across the 57 positions we hold weights for in MGK and 494 in VOO, against full books of 55 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 57 and 494 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 432 positions MGK does not, 48.5% of the fund.
Largest: JPM 1.46%, BRK.B 1.46%, MU 1.44%, XOM 1.00%, JNJ 0.96%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MGK | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.54% | 7.55% | 5.99% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 13.21% | 7.05% | 6.16% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 9.51% | 5.36% | 4.15% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.17% | 4.13% | 1.04% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 6.00% | 3.24% | 2.76% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 4.79% | 2.62% | 2.17% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.48% | 2.86% | 1.62% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.10% | 1.90% | 2.20% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.31% | 1.41% | 1.90% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.95% | 1.36% | 1.59% |
99.1% of MGK is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MGK or VOO?
MGK has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MGK or VOO?
Over the past year MGK returned +12.40% vs +15.60% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), MGK annualized +16.30% vs +13.30% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MGK or VOO?
MGK has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MGK -36.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MGK and VOO?
MGK and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MGK and VOO?
99.1% of MGK's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 50.7% of VOO's is in holdings MGK also owns. They hold 55 positions in common, counted across the 57 positions we hold weights for in MGK and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, MGK or VOO?
MGK yields 0.33% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than MGK?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MGK led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.